|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
I just received the shocking and very saddening
news that my old friend, a good composer and a very important
theorist, Jonathan Kramer died yesterday of leukemia at the
age of only 61. (He's survived by his father.) Jonathan was
best known as a sort of postmodern theorist, hired as such at
Columbia (in 1989) and for years not really recognized there
as a composer as well. He was probably best known for his book
The Time of Music, which dealt with goal-directedness
versus stasis in our conceptions of musical time; powerfully
argued with well-chosen and extensive examples, the book lent
academic credence to the experience of time aimed at in minimalist
music, relating it to kindred trends in European music.
But Jonathan was one of those rare people in whom analytical
prowess and creativity went hand in hand. His music of the 1980s
was what I'd have to call postminimalist: it used no repetition
or grooves, but he would limit himself to only five or six or
seven pitches with such inventiveness that you'd never realize
the pitch spectrum was curtailed. My favorite pieces from this
period were his Music for Piano Number 5 (1979-80), a
Terry Riley-ish romp in mostly 11/16 meter; Moments in and
Out of Time (1981-83), a big, Mahleresque orchestra piece
that stubbornly adhered to the E minor scale; and a mercurial
chamber piece called Atlanta Licks (1984). The limitation
to a few pitches led Jonathan to experiment with using such
limitations to subtly unify passages of otherwise widely varying
style, and in his Notta Sonata for two pianos and percussion
(1992-93) he achieved a true postmodernism, a fractured idiom
in which unreal musics jostled each other in an impression of
split consciousness. I never had the chance to hear his more
recent music, but he was in the process of bringing out a new
disc.
According to his ex-wife, Jonathan developed a blood disease
last August which turned into myloproliferative syndrome, and
only last weekend suddenly turned into acute leukemia. He mentored
hundreds of students, and was a loved teacher.
Jonathan, in a move that must have made colleagues question
his sanity, brought me to teach a semester at Columbia as part
of an attempt to loosen the place up and encourage diversity.
He combined a roving, curious mind with blunt honesty, incisive
opinions, and a genuine desire to make the music world a livelier,
freer place. I had long looked forward to his someday receiving
his just due as a composer. I hope it happens posthumously.
For now, I'm stunned. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|