[jsyn] Motu 828 mkII, OSX, latency

jsyn at music.columbia.edu jsyn at music.columbia.edu
Thu Jul 22 14:00:26 EDT 2004


I entirely agree. The 2882 works great with JSYN/JMSL. I did not 
particularly care for the MOTU 828.

Ross





If you haven't looked at them, I'd recommend considering a 
MetricHalo 
2882 instead of a MOTU 828.  It's a remarkable bit of gear.

darren

On Jul 22, 2004, at 12:22 AM, jsyn at music.columbia.edu wrote:

> Thanks Ryan. I'm closing in on a bit of consumerism. This helps 
a lot
> Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:  jsyn at music.columbia.edu
> Date:  7/21/04 2:16 pm
> To:  jsyn at music.columbia.edu
> Subj:  Re: [jsyn] Motu 828 mkII, OSX, latency
>
> you will get latencies typical of any CoreAudio application.
> quite low.
>
> rf.
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2004, at 12:31 PM, jsyn at music.columbia.edu wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can anyone report what latency is like using the Motu 828 mkII 
under
>> OSX with JSyn?
>>
>> An earlier discussion mentioned high latency under Windows, 
but I am
>> guessing it might be better under OSX.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Treo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> JSyn mailing list
>> JSyn at music.columbia.edu
>> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsyn
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JSyn mailing list
> JSyn at music.columbia.edu
> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsyn
>
> _______________________________________________
> JSyn mailing list
> JSyn at music.columbia.edu
> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsyn
>

_______________________________________________
JSyn mailing list
JSyn at music.columbia.edu
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsyn






More information about the JSyn mailing list