[linux-audio-dev] [i686] xmm regs + gcc inline assembly

Tim Goetze tim at quitte.de
Thu Feb 12 16:34:42 EST 2004

Simon Jenkins wrote:

>>for a simplified example, i'm using
>>  float t[4];
>>  ...
>>  asm ("movaps %%xmm1, %0" : : "m" (t[0]));
>>to move 4 packed floats from xmm1 into 't'.
>I couldn't get this to fail in practice - though I didn't
>try all that hard - unless t isn't on a  16 byte boundary
>in which case it segfaults.

it failed here just a minute ago, with g++ -O6. not a segfault, but
gcc seemed to think that some members of t are zero and omitted them
from the final summation in my code (r = t[0] + t[1] + t[2] + t[3]).

>In theory however your code is telling the compiler that
>array element t[0] is in memory from which the instruction
>reads. It should be more like:
>    asm ("movaps %%xmm1 %0" : "=m" (t) );
>which now tells the compiler that the entire array t
>is in memory to which the instruction writes. This
>*ought* to discourage the optimiser from doing
>anything too drastic. (Maybe/AFAIK/IANAL/etc).

you're right of course, 't' should be an input, not an output.

  asm ("movaps %%xmm1 %0" : "=m" (t));

segfaults, but

  asm ("movaps %%xmm1 %0" : "=m" (t[0]));

works. think i'll have to resort to 128 bit wide data types, a
simple cast should do. all this gcc inline asm stuff is ugly anyway,
and what's another cast among friends.



More information about the linux-audio-dev mailing list