[linux-audio-dev] FW: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation
of the Linux audio online resources (was: linuxdj...)
ico at vt.edu
Mon Mar 27 13:47:09 EST 2006
Just realized that this also matters LAD members, so I am also forwarding it
to the LAD list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces at music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces at music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:29 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Cc: daniel at linuxaudio.org
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] More about consolidation of the Linux
> audioonline resources (was: linuxdj...)
> ico wrote:
> > Sounds absolutely fine by me!
> > I am not sure which would sound better, linuxaudio.org/developers or
> > linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit. Should we have both (via a
> > sym-link)?
> > Please contact me off-list for the necessary login info so that I can
> > uploading stuff.
> So, Do we have a new LAD site available now?
> -ERic Rz.
I initially misunderstood Paul by skimming over his e-mail that he wanted to
move the content. Now that I've figured that out, it seems that the only thing
we need to get the site linked is Paul's current URL/IP where he's hosting the
Also, I am not sure what would be more effective in terms of linking
linuxaudio.org/developer or linuxaudio.org/lad. IMHO both have merit (the
first does not have any redundancy in its name, but the second one is more
accurate in terms of traditional LAD name). Perhaps someone else wants to
chime in with an opinion on this one, or should we simply link both of them
for the time being so that the site becomes available while we discuss the
More information about the linux-audio-dev