Ismael Valladolid Torres
ivalladt at punkass.com
Thu Jan 26 09:45:50 EST 2006
Joe Hartley escribe:
> In a side by side test, I _think_ my old ears hear the slightest of
> differences between recordings done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44
Are you sure that those differences are based on the sampling
> but in the end, I decided to save the disk space and always record
> at 16/44
That's a wise decision.
> since everything I do is going to get resampled to that anyway for
As everything should be dithered while mastering, I would not worry
about resampling. Please note that I focus my comments on bit depth
more than in sampling frequency.
Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande cherté
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20060126/5f521d23/attachment.bin
More information about the linux-audio-user