From gateswideopen at gmail.com Sun Apr 1 03:15:23 2007 From: gateswideopen at gmail.com (naysayer) Date: Sun Apr 1 03:16:44 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] [ANN] JackMix 0.3 hits the shelfs In-Reply-To: <2def88b80703301041n1a8ae808l6b5eb9c6be644fd4@mail.gmail.com> References: <2def88b80703301041n1a8ae808l6b5eb9c6be644fd4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5969dc560704010015l6242e4c0q56fbeb98b27906da@mail.gmail.com> hey, just trying to compile this thingy but tom@localhost ~/programsSRC/jackmix-0.3 $ QTDIR=/usr scons configure qtlibs=/usr/lib/qt4 prefix=/usr scons: Reading SConscript files ... ** installation prefix for the project set to: /usr Checking for uic: uic was found as /usr/bin/uic Checking for UIC version : fine - Qt User Interface Compiler version 4.2.1 Checking for moc: moc was found as /usr/bin/moc Checking for rcc: rcc was found as /usr/bin/rcc Checking for the qt includes : the qt headers were found in /usr/include/qt4/ Checking for jack...ok scons: done reading SConscript files. scons: Building targets ... scons: Nothing to be done for `configure'. scons: done building targets. tom@localhost ~/programsSRC/jackmix-0.3 $ tom@localhost ~/programsSRC/jackmix-0.3 $ scons scons: Reading SConscript files ... Checking for jack...ok scons: done reading SConscript files. scons: Building targets ... g++ -I/usr/include/qt4 -Wall -Werror -g -fpic -O2 -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -Ibackend -I. -Ibackend -Ilibcore -c -o backend/jack_backend.o backend/jack_backend.cpp cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors libcore/guiserver_interface.h:14: warning: 'class JackMix::GuiServer_Interface' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor scons: *** [backend/jack_backend.o] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. what could you suggest? From wsynth at gjcp.net Sun Apr 1 03:34:40 2007 From: wsynth at gjcp.net (Gordon JC Pearce) Date: Sun Apr 1 03:36:38 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] Making impulse responses In-Reply-To: <20070401034724.GA10274@slinkp.com> References: <20070401021453.GA22242@bc.restivo.org> <20070401034724.GA10274@slinkp.com> Message-ID: <1175412880.15894.9.camel@elric> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 23:47 -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: > > Alas, a lot of the good impulse responses I want (i.e. a spring > > reverb, a forest) are in some proprietary Alesis format, and I can't > > use them. But it might be fun to wander around making my own, if I > > can borrow the correct kind of gear for doing that. > > I made some poor man's impulse responses by popping baloons. Then I > lost the files :-( I made some semi-decent guitar ones by plugging in the guitar, and tapping the strings and soundbox in various places. I was surprised at how well it worked. Gordon From a at gaydenko.com Sun Apr 1 04:17:31 2007 From: a at gaydenko.com (Andrew Gaydenko) Date: Sun Apr 1 04:03:10 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] Making impulse responses In-Reply-To: <20070401021453.GA22242@bc.restivo.org> References: <20070401021453.GA22242@bc.restivo.org> Message-ID: <200704011217.31955@goldspace.net> qloud ( http://gaydenko.com/qloud/ ) saves measurements results in files, IRs are among them in wav format. ======= On Sunday 01 April 2007, you wrote: ======= > - gpg control packet > Any special tricks or tips for making impulse responses? > > I see that chuck has a ugen called "impulse" that makes single-sample little > impulse glitches. I suppose I'd use that to generate one, then play it through > speakers or something. Or, any other tips for preparing a wav file for > impulse response, particularly for use with JACE? > > Alas, a lot of the good impulse responses I want (i.e. a spring reverb, a forest) > are in some proprietary Alesis format, and I can't use them. But it might be fun > to wander around making my own, if I can borrow the correct kind of gear for doing that. > > -ken > > From fons at kokkinizita.net Sun Apr 1 05:57:07 2007 From: fons at kokkinizita.net (Fons Adriaensen) Date: Sun Apr 1 05:52:50 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] Making impulse responses In-Reply-To: <20070401034724.GA10274@slinkp.com> References: <20070401021453.GA22242@bc.restivo.org> <20070401034724.GA10274@slinkp.com> Message-ID: <20070401095707.GA6098@linux-2.site> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 11:47:24PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:14:53PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > > Any special tricks or tips for making impulse responses? > > > > I see that chuck has a ugen called "impulse" that makes > > single-sample little impulse glitches. I suppose I'd use that to > > generate one, then play it through speakers or something. > > I tried that once, it didn't work. The single-sample-impulse > supposedly works well when feeding eg. a digital reverb, but when I > tried to feed it into speakers, I didn't hear anything at all. YMMV. That's why I wrote Aliki ! It uses logarithmic sweeps - the method pioneerd by Farina. See my LAC2006 paper for the background. If youd don't need a 'real' room for a reverb but just some nice effect, then any decaying burst of noise will work. Generate it using your favourite softsynth. This way you can also make 'gated' or 'reverse' reverb etc. -- FA Follie! Follie! Delirio vano ? questo ! From fons at kokkinizita.net Sun Apr 1 06:08:28 2007 From: fons at kokkinizita.net (Fons Adriaensen) Date: Sun Apr 1 06:05:49 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] Legalities of impulse responses In-Reply-To: <20070401022255.GA22498@bc.restivo.org> References: <20070401022255.GA22498@bc.restivo.org> Message-ID: <20070401100828.GB6098@linux-2.site> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:55PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > IANAL, but if I'm reading this license correctly then these IR's > are useless for music. It sounds like any data processed using > it (i.e. reverb using this hall's IR) then becomes the property > of TKK. Gah! > > What exactly is "commercial use" of a reverb? I'd have to think > that'd mean commercial redistribution of the IR's, including them > in commercial products, not using them in a song or production, no? This wording is indeed very confusing. I was planning to write them and ask. It would be a pity if you can't use the Pori IR in free music, as they sound very nice. -- FA Follie! Follie! Delirio vano ? questo ! From pieterp at joow.be Sun Apr 1 06:30:10 2007 From: pieterp at joow.be (Pieter Palmers) Date: Sun Apr 1 06:35:51 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] audio card In-Reply-To: <20070329221632.phdk3bez8gk044ck@webmail.internet.com.uy> References: <20070329221632.phdk3bez8gk044ck@webmail.internet.com.uy> Message-ID: <460F89B2.7080607@joow.be> ljc@internet.com.uy wrote: > > hello list, > > yet another question about sound cards... > > i want to buy a card for my new laptop. it doesn't have pcmcia, so i > need a firewire or usb card. i want 8 analog outputs, but i'm not > interested in many inputs, two is just fine. midi i/o would be very > welcome. > > i found that the general layout of the m-audio firewire 410 is exactly > what i'm looking for, but i searched a bit and i found out it's not > supported by freebob. > > can anyone recommend a card with similar specs to the firewire 410 > that's compatible with linux? does anyone know if the 410 might be > supported in the future? > Regarding device support, the stuff I can vouch for at the moment because we have them to test with is: - Terratec Phase88 - ESI Quatafire 610 - Edirol FA-101, FA-66 A more elaborate list of (future) device support: Devices that should work: - Terratec Phase88, Phase 24, Phase X24, EWS Mic2, EWS Mic8 - ESI Quatafire 610 - Edirol FA-101, FA-66 Device that might work (no vendor support yet): - Focusrite Saffire, Saffire LE, Saffire Pro10, Saffire Pro26 - PreSonus FireBox, FirePod - Apogee Rosetta, AD-16X, DA-16X (with FireWire expansion) - PrismSound Orpheus - iCON devices - M-Audio FireWire Solo, Ozonic - CME UF-400e expansion - PrismSound: ADA-8XR - Phonic mixers - Stanton FinalScratch 2 audio interface Devices that will probably be supported in the next version: - PreSonus: Inspire 1394, FireStudio, FireStudio Lightpipe (*) - TC Electronics: Konnekt 24D, Konnekt 8, Konnekt Live (*) - Alesis: FireWire range (**) - Metric Halo devices (**) - Apogee: FireWire range (***) - PrismSound: FireWire range (***) - MotU: 828mkII, Traveller (****) (*) Contacts are made, and are very positive (**) Contacts are made, are positive but we still have to see (***) Contacts are made, are moderately positive, to be seen (****) Reverse engineered, not recommended to buy this. Unclear at the moment: - Echo Audio devices - Behringer FCA202 - mLAN device - M-Audio NRV10, ProjectMix I/O Devices that will probably not be supported soon: - Any RME FireWire device - M-Audio 410, M-Audio 1814 - Hercules 16/12 FW On another matter, chances are that the SSL Duende processing unit will be supported too. This list is not complete, but tries to give an overview. We're going to provide an updated device support list on the website soon. One important thing to note is that some device vendors use different chipsets for different devices, making that it's not because one of their devices works, the others will. Greets, Pieter From Gregoire.Banderet at ge.com Tue Apr 17 08:30:47 2007 From: Gregoire.Banderet at ge.com (Gregoire Banderet) Date: Tue Apr 17 08:37:22 2007 Subject: [linux-audio-user] USB chip audio with compression? Message-ID: <4624BDF7.6050506@ge.com> Hello, We are at the design phase of a new embedded product based on a PowerPC and Linux. The device should have an audio output and an audio input, if possible with a HW compression (MP3) and if possible with an USB interface. Is there such device supported (with a working driver) by Linux? Thanks for your help, Greg