[linux-audio-user] OT: FUD or not? what is your opinion?

Lars Luthman lars.luthman at gmail.com
Mon Feb 19 10:50:55 EST 2007

On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> Recently, a couple of blogs/sites have come to my attention all of which
> address some of my personal trepidations regarding desktop Linux adoption
> that have been growing inside my mind for some time now:
> http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/the-slowdown-of-gnulinux/
> http://blogs.gnome.org/view/timj/2006/12/20/0
> Now, while not all will care for Gnome and its current state, apparently KDE
> does not fare much better either:
> http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/2006/12/21/not-even-one-line-of-code/
> I know that many of you don't care for KDE either. Still, I hope you will
> agree with me that this is a concerning trend nonetheless.
> So, what does this really mean?

It doesn't mean anything. People are always complaining on the internet,
that's what it's for.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20070219/63601c04/attachment.bin

More information about the linux-audio-user mailing list