[music-dsp] fx architecture: Interleaved or flat samples..

[Didier Dambrin]

> On 10/20/2010 8:23 AM, Didier Dambrin wrote:
>> I'd agree, I stopped thinking that having grown a DSP library working
>> on interleaved data was a bad idea (having to code things twice, poor
>> expandability) when SSE came in. Big benefits for filtering,
>> resampling, etc.
>>
> That's true if you code SSE by hand.
> All stuff like IPP or vDSP works better on non interleaved data.
>

A lot of the "complex" versions (but not all) in IPP work on interleaved 
data. But yes, sadly it wasn't designed for this.


> Having tried both. interleaved data in older version of our audio engine
> and now non interleaved, I can tell you that it's way easier with non
> interleaved.
> Moreover it allow you to have different path for different channel easily.
>
>
> -- 
> Olivier Tristan
> Ultimate Sound Bank
>
> --
> dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
> subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, 
> dsp links
> http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp