[Portaudio] portaudio on fedora
jan van katwijk
j.vankatwijk at gmail.com
Thu Jan 7 05:54:06 EST 2010
I am using the non-blocking api. When running on higher rates (96000,
192000) I need all the computing power I can get.
FYI I enclose the startup information I get. The input and output stream are
- in principle - user selectable, a user clicks on a combobox element, these
elements are filled on startup and that is the first part of the output.
The last lines are the messages from portaudio, and most of the times I get
them, as said before, regardless of the portaudio package I am using,
regardless of the latency
selected. And, it is a typical linux/fedora/ubuntu problem, when using
slackware (on a very old machine), or using windows (either vista or w7 with
dsound), no problem at all.
2010/1/7 Damian Minkov <damencho at sip-communicator.org>
> we are also using portaudio on different platforms for a voip
> application - Linux, Windows, Macosx, we are using the blocking api.
> To make it work on all of the platforms and especially on different
> linux distribution we had to play with the suggestedLatency param when
> opening the stream. We have still one issue with buffers and quality
> when using portaudio with plain alsa (without pulseaudio) on a
> soundcard which natively supports only 48 kHz and has no hardware
> mixing, but still struggling with it. For Linux and Macosx
> defaultHighInputLatency is working fine for us for windows we have
> used a value of 0.1. Till now nobody reported a problem
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:29 PM, jan van katwijk <j.vankatwijk at gmail.com>
> > Dear forum members
> > I have a simple application using Qt for the gui and portaudio for the
> > soundcard. I started my development
> > using slackware, and it worked perfectly. Then I ported the application
> > windows (vista) using MINGW
> > and - I must admit to my surprise - it worked within two days.
> > Based upon reactions of other linux users who were interested in my
> > application,
> > I moved to a more "main stream" distribution. First Fedora 11. Problems
> > the combination of portaudio and pulse.
> > Applying a set of patches lead to a - some times - working version.
> > to fedora 12 was no real
> > success, my applications continues to fail in the portaudio part.
> > with and without patches,
> > tre stock package, no difference. Sometimes it gives a message,
> > that some portaudio lines
> > cannot handle things, most of the times, it just says nothing, does not
> > provide errors on initialization
> > but no stream data.
> > In the mean time I had to change computer and are now running W7, where
> > applications works perfectly,
> > and Fedora 12. I changed fedora for Ubuntu: same results, no functioning
> > application.
> > I read about problems/potential problems when running portaudio on top of
> > pulse, applied the patches, checked
> > a thousand times.
> > I am now struggling for three monts with this problem, any help is really
> > appreciated.
> > FYI
> > my application reads samples, shows some spectrum info, does some basic
> > frequency shifts and it does
> > some selectable decoding, next to controlling a simple radio device, i.e.
> > is a software defined radio.
> > all the best and many thanks on beforehand.
> > janK
> > --
> > Jan van Katwijk
> > +31 (0)15 3698980
> > +31 (0) 628260355
> > _______________________________________________
> > Portaudio mailing list
> > Portaudio at music.columbia.edu
> > http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/portaudio
> Portaudio mailing list
> Portaudio at music.columbia.edu
Jan van Katwijk
+31 (0)15 3698980
+31 (0) 628260355
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Portaudio